Fixed CAM vs Traditional Reconciliation Modeler
Compare what you would recover under traditional CAM reconciliation vs a Fixed CAM structure (flat $/SF + annual escalator) over 3-5 years.
Fixed CAM charges tenants a flat per-SF rate that escalates annually (typically 3–5%), replacing the traditional reconciliation process. While Fixed CAM eliminates year-end true-ups and reduces administrative burden, it can leave significant recovery on the table when actual expenses outpace the escalator.
Why this matters
Fixed CAM structures are gaining popularity because they eliminate reconciliation complexity. But they often leave money on the table when expenses grow faster than the fixed escalator. This modeler shows the real economic impact so you can make an informed decision.
Modeling Period
Historical Data (Per Year)
Year 2022
Year 2023
Year 2024
Year 2025
Year 2026
Fixed CAM Terms
Year-by-Year Comparison
Enter historical data and Fixed CAM terms to see a year-by-year comparison.
Summary & Recommendation
Enter your email to unlock revenue and asset value projections.
Total Traditional Recovery
—
Total Fixed CAM Revenue
—
Cumulative Delta Over Period
—
Average Annual Difference
—
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Fixed CAM?
Is Fixed CAM better for landlords or tenants?
When does traditional CAM reconciliation recover more than Fixed CAM?
Can I convert from Fixed CAM to traditional reconciliation?
Related tools