Public-record case study

Broward County FL: tax appeal fee without refund credit case study

A public-record office lease case study showing Rule 10 advisory finding: $9,500 tax appeal fee billed with no corresponding refund credit despite a lease refund-back requirement.

Broward County Board of County Commissioners2022 statementNNN leaseOffice
Tax Appeal & Consulting Fees billed at $9,500.
No refund credit visible in the 2022 statement.

What happened

The Broward County lease allows landlords to pass through tax appeal costs but requires any refund from a successful appeal to be credited back to tenants pro-rata (Section 9.4). The 2022 reconciliation included $9,500 in tax appeal fees with no refund credit. If the appeal was successful, Broward County may be owed its 6% share of any refund received.

Findings from the pipeline

Rule 10: Tax Overallocation

medium confidence

$0

Tax appeal fees of $9,500.00 billed to tenant but no refund credit appears in the statement. Lease Section 9.4 requires any appeal refund to be credited pro-rata.

Lease evidence

If such contest results in a refund or reduction, Landlord shall credit Tenant's Pro-Rata Share of any refund received. Section 9.4.

Section 9.4, page 14

Math proof

tax_appeal_fees=9500.00, tax_refund_credits=None

Lease evidence

  • Tax appeal costs recoverable; refunds must be credited back pro-rata (Section 9.4).
  • Tenant pro-rata share: 6.00%.

Why this matters for your firm

Tax appeal refund withholding is a silent overcharge: tenants pay the appeal costs but never see the benefit if the appeal succeeds. The landlord has every incentive to keep the refund and no obligation to self-report unless the lease explicitly requires it. Only a reconciliation audit catches this.

Correction package excerpt

Request for Cooperative Review of Certain Line Items. The automated review flagged $9,500 in tax appeal fees with no corresponding refund credit. Please confirm the outcome of the appeal and provide any refund credit due.

Frequently asked questions

What findings did CAMAudit surface in the Broward County Board of County Commissioners case?

CAMAudit flagged 1 finding with an apparent overcharge of $0. Each finding cites the specific detection rule, dollar amount, and the lease provision that grounds the dispute.

Can my firm reproduce these findings on a live client engagement?

Yes. Your firm uploads the lease and CAM bill. CAMAudit checks them against the same rule set. Your firm reviews the findings. Then your firm sends the branded report to the client.

Is Office a common property type for CAM audit engagements?

CAMAudit handles all commercial property types: retail, office, industrial, mixed-use, and specialty. The detection rules apply wherever a tenant pays CAM or operating expenses under a lease with specific definitions, caps, or exclusion lists.

What is a correction package and does CAMAudit generate one?

A correction draft is a factual starting point that specifies each overcharge by rule, dollar amount, and lease provision. CAMAudit generates a draft grounded in the specific audit findings for advisor and counsel review.

Run these same detection rules on your client engagements

Upload a client lease and CAM bill. CAMAudit applies the same rule set used in this case study. Your firm reviews the findings and sends the branded report to the client.

Book a partner walkthrough

Public-record note

This page summarizes public-record documents and CAMAudit output for educational and marketing purposes. It does not imply endorsement by Broward County Board of County Commissioners or any third party. Readers should review the underlying lease, statement, and dispute timeline for their own facts.