7 CAM reconciliation statement errors that cost tenants thousands per year. Each includes the exact formula to verify it against your lease [2026].
Think your lease might have this issue? Run a free CAM audit to check.
Find My OverchargesRun these 7 checks on your own statement
Run the checks on your own statement Most audits complete in under 15 minutes.
CAMAudit catches the errors that are easy to miss when reviewing manually.
Find My OverchargesSee a sample report firstMost tenants pay their annual CAM reconciliation without question. The statement arrives, looks official, and gets filed. That assumption costs the average overcharged tenant $9,000 to $12,000 per year, and the overcharge compounds silently for every year they don't look. If you are new to the reconciliation process, see what is CAM reconciliation before working through these errors.
CAM reconciliation statement error: A CAM reconciliation statement error is a miscalculation or misclassification in the annual landlord-prepared document comparing estimated versus actual common area maintenance expenses. Material errors appear in 40% of commercial statements and include pro-rata denominator manipulation, management fee overcharges, and improper capital expense pass-through.
These are the 7 errors that appear most frequently and produce the largest dollar impact. Each comes with the exact formula to verify it in your own statement.
Key takeaway: Material billing errors appear in 40% of commercial CAM reconciliations, with the average overcharged tenant losing $9,000 to $12,000 per year across the seven most common error types.
Tango Analytics found material errors in approximately 40% of commercial CAM reconciliations reviewed. The average overcharge across audited properties is 15 to 20% of total CAM billed. Springbord Research independently puts the error rate at 30% of statements.
40% of commercial CAM reconciliations contain material billing errors (Tango Analytics, 2023)
30% of CAM statements contain billing errors costing tenants thousands annually (Springbord Research, 2024)
The reconciliation process aggregates dozens of expense categories, applies allocation methodologies, and involves manual inputs. Any of those steps can introduce errors. Without a systematic audit, most errors go undetected for years.
Not so fast if you assume your property manager catches this. Property management firms apply the same calculation methodology to every tenant in the building. A wrong denominator is wrong for everyone. A fee-on-fee error runs through the entire property. No one at the landlord's side has an incentive to find it.
For context on how the full reconciliation process works, see the CAM reconciliation audit guide.
| Error type | Frequency | Typical annual cost | Lookback period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-rata share error | Very common | $2,000 to $8,000 | 2 to 3 years lease |
| Management fee overcharge | Most common | $5,000 to $15,000 | 2 to 3 years lease |
| Capital expenditure misclassification | Common | $1,000 to $10,000/item | 2 to 3 years lease |
| Gross-up violation | Common | 5 to 15% of variable costs | 2 to 3 years lease |
| CAM cap violation | Moderate | 3 to 8% of annual CAM | 2 to 3 years lease |
| Base year error | Moderate | $500 to $3,000/year | 2 to 3 years lease |
| Excluded service charges | Common | $500 to $5,000/year | 2 to 3 years lease |
"Pro-rata share errors are the easiest to miss and often the most expensive. A landlord using occupied area instead of total leasable area as the denominator can shift 2 to 5 percentage points of costs onto active tenants. On a $500,000 annual CAM pool, a 3-point shift is $15,000 per year, and it compounds silently for the life of the lease." — Angel Campa, Founder of CAMAudit
Your pro-rata share is your square footage divided by the total square footage of the property. Errors occur when: (1) anchor tenants are excluded from the denominator but their pro-rata expenses remain in the numerator, (2) common area or vacant space is excluded without corresponding expense reductions, (3) your tenant SF is wrong.
The most common source is denominator substitution. Landlords use "occupied area" (excluding vacant units) instead of "total leasable area" as the denominator. When occupancy is 80%, your pro-rata share increases by the equivalent of filling in that missing 20%, which means you absorb costs that would otherwise be shared with a hypothetical tenant occupying the vacant space.
A 2% discrepancy on $100,000 annual CAM equals $2,000 per year. On a 3-year lookback, that is $6,000. Larger properties with anchor exclusions can produce 4 to 8 percentage point errors, which on a $500,000 CAM pool equals $20,000 to $40,000 per year.
Formula:
Your % = Your SF ÷ Total Property SF (correct denominator)
Pull your lease and locate the exact denominator definition, usually in the CAM section or a definitions exhibit. Request a certified building SF measurement from your property manager. Calculate your own percentage and compare it to what appears on the reconciliation. If there is a discrepancy greater than 0.1%, document the lease language, your calculation, and the overcharge amount for each year in your lookback period.
For a full walkthrough of denominator errors and worked examples, see pro-rata share calculation error.
Capital expenditures (new equipment, structural improvements, parking lot resurfacing) must be amortized over their useful life per GAAP, typically 5 to 30 years depending on the asset. When landlords expense the full cost in a single year, your share of that year's reconciliation is overstated by the unamortized portion.
Formula:
Allowable annual charge = Total CapEx ÷ Useful life years
Check: Review reconciliation for large one-time items. Anything over $5,000 for a single item is potentially a capital expenditure requiring amortization.
What to do: Request the underlying invoices for any reconciliation line item exceeding $5,000. Verify whether the item is a repair (expensed in full, acceptable) or a capital improvement (should be amortized). Common CapEx items misclassified as operating expenses include HVAC replacements, elevator modernizations, roof replacements, and parking lot repaving. For each incorrectly expensed item, the annual overcharge equals your pro-rata share of the full cost minus your pro-rata share of the correct annual amortization amount.
Management fees appear on every CAM reconciliation. The lease specifies both the percentage (typically 3 to 5%) and the base (controllable expenses, all operating expenses, or other defined pool). Errors occur when the percentage exceeds the lease cap or the base is broader than allowed.
Formula:
Maximum fee = Allowable base × Lease cap %
Check: Find your lease's management fee provision. Calculate the maximum permitted fee. Compare to actual charge.
What to do: Locate your lease's management fee section and extract three data points: (1) the stated percentage cap, (2) the defined expense base, and (3) any listed exclusions from the base. Then pull the reconciliation's total expense pool and subtract excluded categories. Multiply the result by your lease cap to get the maximum permitted fee. Any amount above that is an overcharge. When we built the management fee detection rule in CAMAudit, we found this is the most consistently identified error because landlords apply the same methodology to every tenant in the building simultaneously.
For a complete guide to management fee detection and recovery, see management fee overcharge on CAM.
"When we built the gross-up detection rule, we found that some landlords were grossing up fixed costs that do not vary with occupancy at all: property taxes, insurance premiums, management fees. The lease has to explicitly permit gross-up, and it usually specifies a maximum occupancy threshold of 95%. Applying gross-up to $300,000 in fixed expenses at an 18% factor is a $54,000 inflation before your pro-rata share." — Angel Campa, Founder of CAMAudit
Gross-up provisions allow landlords to adjust variable expenses as if the building were X% occupied (typically 95%). The intent: protect landlords from low-occupancy years artificially deflating shared costs. The abuse: applying gross-up to fixed costs (insurance, real estate taxes, management fees) that don't actually vary with occupancy.
Formula:
Correct gross-up applies only to variable expenses
Check: If your reconciliation shows gross-up adjustments, verify the gross-up is applied only to expenses that actually scale with occupancy (janitorial, HVAC, utilities).
What to do: Request a line-by-line gross-up calculation from your landlord showing which expense categories were grossed up and by what factor. Your lease defines the occupancy threshold (usually 95%) and may specify which categories are subject to gross-up. Fixed costs, including real estate taxes, insurance premiums, and management fees, do not scale with occupancy and should never be grossed up. If the landlord applied gross-up to $200,000 in fixed expenses at a 1.19x factor (80% to 95% occupancy), the overcharge on those categories alone is $38,000 before your pro-rata allocation.
Real-world example: A medical office tenant submitted a reconciliation showing gross-up applied to property taxes ($180,000), insurance ($95,000), and management fees ($42,000), in addition to the variable expense categories. Total grossed-up fixed costs: $317,000. At an 18% gross-up factor (from 78% to 95% occupancy), the inflation was $57,060. At an 8% pro-rata share, the tenant's overcharge on gross-up alone was $4,565 per year, or $13,695 over three years.
For more on how gross-up calculations should work, see gross-up calculation in commercial leases.
Many leases cap year-over-year CAM increases (typically 3 to 5% compounded or cumulative). The cap may apply to all CAM or only to "controllable" expenses. Violations occur when increases exceed the cap, or when landlords exclude their largest cost drivers from the controllable category to sidestep the cap.
Formula:
Maximum allowed = Prior year CAM × (1 + cap %)[compounded] orBase year CAM + (cap % × years × base year CAM)[cumulative]
Check: Compare current year CAM to prior years. If the increase exceeds your cap percentage, you have a potential violation.
What to do: Identify your lease's CAM cap provision and determine whether it is compounded annually or cumulative. Then trace your CAM bills from the base year (usually the first full lease year) forward, applying the cap formula to calculate the maximum allowed charge for each subsequent year. If any year's actual charge exceeds the capped maximum, you have a violation. Document each year's overcharge separately, as they compound.
Real-world example: A retail tenant's lease capped controllable CAM increases at 4% per year compounded from year one. Year-one controllable CAM was $28,000. By year five, the maximum allowed was $34,078 ($28,000 x 1.04^5). Actual year-five controllable CAM billed was $39,500. Overcharge for year five: $5,422. Over the prior three auditable years (years 3, 4, and 5), the cumulative overcharge was $11,840.
For a detailed guide to identifying and disputing CAM cap violations, see CAM cap violation guide.
For gross/modified gross leases with expense stops, the "base year" is the expense level above which tenants pay increases. Errors occur when: (1) the wrong year is designated as base, (2) the base year excludes expenses that subsequent years include, (3) one-time base year credits or concessions inflate the base artificially.
Formula:
Tenant share = (Current expenses − Base year expenses) × Pro-rata %
Check: Verify your lease specifies the base year and that the figure used matches the actual documented expenses from that year.
What to do: Request a copy of the official base year expense documentation from your landlord. This should be the audited or compiled financial statements for the base year, not an estimate. Verify that the expense categories included in the base year match those used in subsequent reconciliation years. A common manipulation is using an inflated base year (by including one-time items in the base) which suppresses the tenant's liability in early years but then dropping those items from subsequent years, creating an asymmetric calculation that eventually works against the tenant. Confirm the base year figure your lease cites is the actual documented expense, not an approximation.
Every commercial lease lists expense categories explicitly excluded from CAM. Common exclusions: executive salaries, legal and accounting fees not related to tenant operations, financing costs, ground lease payments, and capital improvements. When excluded items appear in the reconciliation, they create direct overcharges.
Check: Pull your lease's CAM exclusions list. Review each reconciliation line item against it. Flag any expense that matches an excluded category.
What to do: Create a two-column comparison: your lease's exclusions list on the left, every reconciliation line item on the right. Any match is a billable dispute item. Request the underlying invoice or documentation for any line item you cannot clearly categorize. Landlords sometimes use general category labels in reconciliations that obscure the nature of the underlying expense. "Administrative expenses" may include officer salaries; "professional fees" may include litigation costs unrelated to your tenancy.
Finding one error is common. Finding several in the same reconciliation is not unusual. This happens because property management firms apply the same methodology across all tenants in a building. A wrong denominator is a wrong denominator for everyone.
Here's the thing: multiple findings change the negotiation entirely. A landlord disputing a single $3,000 item is in a different conversation than a landlord facing a documented $21,000 multi-category overcharge with page and line references for each item. Document each finding separately before contacting your landlord. Bundling findings strengthens your position and makes a credit agreement significantly more likely.
For cases with multiple errors, see the tenant CAM audit guide for the aggregation methodology.
Not every tenant has time to review all seven categories before the dispute window closes. Prioritization by expected dollar impact:
| Priority | Error Category | Dollar Impact | Time to Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Management fee base error | $3,000 to $30,000/yr | 30 minutes |
| 2 | Pro-rata denominator error | $2,000 to $50,000/yr | 45 minutes |
| 3 | Capital expense misclassification | $5,000 to $200,000/yr | 60 minutes |
| 4 | CAM cap compounding | $1,000 to $15,000/yr cumulative | 45 minutes |
| 5 | Gross-up on fixed expenses | $2,000 to $20,000/yr | 60 minutes |
| 6 | Excluded categories | $5,000 to $100,000/yr | 30 minutes |
| 7 | Insurance commissions | $500 to $5,000/yr | 30 minutes |
Items 1 and 2 require the least specialized knowledge and produce consistent results. Items 3 and 5 require more analysis but frequently produce the largest individual overcharges.
Before paying a CAM reconciliation balance, gather the executed lease (and all amendments), the annual reconciliation statement, the prior year reconciliation for year-over-year comparison, and the lease's CAM definition, management fee provision, pro-rata share definition, and CAM cap provision.
1. GL exclusion scrub. Any single line item over $5,000 (roof repairs, HVAC replacements, parking lot resurfacing, elevator modernization) is a potential capital expenditure that should be amortized over its useful life, not expensed in full in a single year.
2. Pro-rata numerator. Your square footage in the reconciliation numerator should match the rentable square footage specified in your lease. Errors occur when landlords use a different SF figure than the lease specified.
3. Pro-rata denominator. The denominator is the total rentable square footage used to compute your percentage. Errors here cause systemic overcharges. Common errors include anchor tenants excluded from the denominator while their expenses remain in the pool, occupied-only SF used instead of total leasable SF, and denominators not updated after building remeasurement.
4. Management fee. Find your lease's management fee provision. Calculate the maximum permitted fee: allowable base × lease cap percentage. Compare to the actual charge in the reconciliation. Admin fees stacked on top of a management fee charge without lease authorization are a separate violation.
5. Gross-up. If the reconciliation shows a gross-up adjustment, identify which expense categories it applies to. Any fixed-cost category (property taxes, insurance, landscaping contracts) in the gross-up pool is a disputed charge. Also confirm that the occupancy percentage used matches the target specified in your lease's gross-up clause.
6. CAM cap compliance. If your lease has a cap, calculate the maximum allowed charge using the correct cap type: compounded (prior year CAM × (1 + cap %)) or cumulative (base year CAM + (cap % × years elapsed × base year CAM)). Compare current-year charges against the applicable formula.
7. Base year accuracy. Confirm your lease identifies the base year and that the actual documented expenses from that year match the figure used in the reconciliation formula. Confirm the expense categories included in the base year match those used in subsequent years.
8. Insurance passthrough. Request the insurance certificate and premium invoice for the policy year. Confirm the named insured and policy property match your building. Verify the insurance line item in the reconciliation matches the actual net premium, not an inflated amount that includes retained commissions.
9. Tax allocation. Request the property tax bill for the assessment year. Confirm the parcel matches your property. Verify the amount in the reconciliation matches the actual bill, with no taxes from related entities or other properties included.
10. Utility billing. Identify which utilities appear in your CAM reconciliation. Confirm they are for common areas only. Cross-reference against any utility charges paid directly under your lease to check for double-billing.
11. Controllable expense cap. If your lease has a controllable expense cap, verify that property taxes, insurance, and other explicitly uncontrollable items are excluded from the capped pool before the cap is applied.
12. Year-over-year variance. Compare each expense category in the current reconciliation against the same category in the prior year. Any category that increases more than 10% year-over-year without a corresponding change in property operations warrants written explanation from the landlord.
After completing the checklist: if no issues are found, document for next year's review. If math errors are clear, send a dispute letter draft citing your calculation before the dispute deadline. If you find multiple findings across categories, run a full forensic audit to generate a complete dispute letter draft with lease citations.
Upload your lease and reconciliation to CAMAudit. The platform runs all 14 detection rules and flags every error with the specific calculation. If nothing is found, you receive a "CAM Verified" report confirming your charges are accurate. Once errors are identified, the how to dispute CAM charges guide covers the dispute process step by step.
Upload your lease and reconciliation to CAMAudit. The platform runs all 14 detection rules, including these 7 plus 7 additional checks, and flags every error with the specific calculation. If nothing is found, you receive a "CAM Verified" report confirming your charges are accurate.
How do I know if my CAM reconciliation is wrong?
Compare each line item in your reconciliation to your lease's CAM provisions. Check the management fee cap, verify your pro-rata percentage, confirm no excluded expenses are included, and verify year-over-year increases don't exceed your CAM cap. CAMAudit automates this comparison against your specific lease terms.
What is the most common CAM reconciliation error?
Management fee overcharges and pro-rata share errors are the most frequently identified errors. Management fee overcharges often result from fee-on-fee billing or an incorrectly broad expense base. Pro-rata errors typically involve denominator manipulation, such as using occupied area instead of total leasable area.
Can I audit my own CAM reconciliation?
Yes. You need your lease (specifically the CAM section) and the detailed reconciliation statement with all line items. The process involves comparing each charge to your lease's provisions and running the relevant formulas. CAMAudit automates this process for $79 and covers all 14 detection rules.
What is the statute of limitations for disputing a CAM overcharge?
Most commercial leases include an audit rights window of 60 to 180 days after receiving the annual reconciliation. State statutes of limitations for written contract claims typically run 4 to 6 years, depending on the state. The shorter of your lease's audit rights window and your state statute of limitations controls. If you miss your lease's window, you may still have a claim under the state statute of limitations, but your position is weaker.
Can a landlord bill CAM charges that are not itemized?
No. Standard commercial lease language requires the landlord to provide a detailed reconciliation statement upon request. If your reconciliation shows only a total CAM amount without line-item detail, send a written request for the itemized breakdown with supporting documentation. Most states and most lease audit rights provisions require this level of disclosure. If the landlord refuses, that refusal itself may support a dispute position.
How do I calculate how much I am owed from a CAM overcharge?
Multiply your annual overcharge amount by the number of years in your lookback period. If your management fee overcharge is $4,200 per year and your lease allows a 3-year lookback, your total recovery claim is $12,600, plus any interest your state or lease allows. Document the calculation for each year separately, as overcharge amounts may vary year to year.
What is the difference between a CAM reconciliation error and a CAM statement error?
CAM reconciliation errors refer to any billing error in the overall annual reconciliation process, including errors in how expenses are coded, allocated, or calculated before the statement is prepared. CAM statement errors specifically refers to errors in the delivered document itself, the landlord-prepared accounting that compares estimated versus actual charges. In practice, both terms describe the same category of billing mistakes. The statement is where the errors become visible, but their origin may be in the expense coding or allocation methodology that precedes it.
