Finding quality
Confidence scoring helps partners separate clear math findings from issues that need judgment.
Problem
Some CAM findings are direct calculations. Others depend on lease interpretation, unclear statement labels, or missing landlord backup. Treating every issue as equally certain can lead to overstatement, uncomfortable client calls, and weak landlord follow-up.
Solution
CAMAudit labels findings with confidence context so partners can decide how to present them. The goal is not to make every issue sound certain. The goal is to make the evidence level clear enough for a responsible next step.
Proof points
High-confidence findings can be presented more directly.
Medium-confidence findings show where review or backup may be needed.
Low-confidence and advisory items are separated from confirmed totals.
Confidence context protects partner credibility during delivery.
Workflow
01
The engine evaluates whether the finding is directly supported or interpretive.
02
Partners see whether a finding should be delivered as confirmed, likely, or advisory.
03
Delivery can match the evidence rather than forcing every item into the same tone.
Related feature pages
Partners control what clients see, when reports are published, and how findings are positioned.
Findings are stronger when the report shows the clause, statement line, and calculation path behind the issue.
Partners publish client-facing audit packages that carry their own brand and explain the recovery case.
Related guides and tools
FAQ
No. Confidence scores describe evidence quality, not a recovery guarantee. Landlord response, lease interpretation, and negotiation still matter.
Low-confidence findings are best treated as review questions or backup requests, not as confirmed overcharge claims.
Next step
