Quality control
Partners control what clients see, when reports are published, and how findings are positioned.
Problem
A CAM audit platform can surface useful findings, but partners still need judgment. Some issues are confirmed, some are advisory, and some need a softer explanation because the lease language is ambiguous. Sending raw output directly to clients can create confusion or overpromise recovery.
Solution
CAMAudit is built around partner review. Firms can inspect findings, confidence notes, report content, and dispute letter drafts before publishing a client-facing package under their own brand.
Proof points
Findings are reviewed before publication.
Confidence notes help partners decide how firmly to present each issue.
The partner controls report delivery and client follow-up.
Review controls support CPA, attorney, tenant rep, and advisory workflows.
Workflow
01
Review amounts, explanations, confidence, and evidence before deciding what to deliver.
02
Separate confirmed recovery items from advisory questions and client education points.
03
Release the branded report only when the partner is ready.
Related feature pages
Confidence scoring helps partners separate clear math findings from issues that need judgment.
Partners publish client-facing audit packages that carry their own brand and explain the recovery case.
When findings support action, partners can prepare a dispute letter draft grounded in the reviewed audit record.
Related guides and tools
FAQ
The workflow is designed for partner review before publishing. Partners decide how to handle findings based on client context, evidence quality, and professional judgment.
The client is relying on the partner, not a software vendor. Review controls keep the partner accountable for the final delivery posture.
Next step
