Quality control
You control what clients see, when reports are published, and how findings are positioned.
Problem
A CAM audit platform can surface useful findings, but you still need judgment. Some issues are confirmed, some are advisory, and some need a softer explanation because the lease language is ambiguous. Sending raw output directly to clients can create confusion or overpromise recovery.
Solution
CAMAudit is built around your review. Your firm can inspect findings, confidence notes, report content, and dispute letter drafts before publishing a client-facing package under your own brand.
Proof points
Findings are reviewed before publication.
Confidence notes help you decide how firmly to present each issue.
You control report delivery and client follow-up.
Review controls support CPA, attorney, tenant rep, and advisory workflows.
Workflow
01
Review amounts, explanations, confidence, and evidence before deciding what to deliver.
02
Separate confirmed recovery items from advisory questions and client education points.
03
Release the branded report only when you are ready.
Related feature pages
Confidence scoring helps you separate clear math findings from issues that need judgment.
You publish client-facing audit packages that carry your own brand and explain the recovery case.
Findings show the overcharge. The dispute letter draft is how your client acts on it. We write it from the audit. You review and send.
Related guides and tools
FAQ
The workflow is designed for your review before publishing. You decide how to handle findings based on client context, evidence quality, and professional judgment.
The client is relying on your firm, not a software vendor. Review controls keep you accountable for the final delivery posture.
Next step