Forensic checks
Every audit runs a consistent set of forensic CAM checks so partners do not depend on memory or one-off spreadsheet review.
Problem
CAM overcharges often follow the same patterns: management fee bases, pro-rata share denominators, excluded costs, cap calculations, gross-up rules, and base year manipulation. A manual review can miss these checks when the file is rushed or the reviewer only searches for obvious line items.
Solution
CAMAudit runs 20 detection rules against the extracted lease and reconciliation data. Each rule targets a known CAM audit failure mode, giving partners a consistent review layer before they decide which findings belong in the client conversation.
Proof points
Math-heavy rules include management fees, pro-rata share, gross-up, caps, and base year checks.
Classification rules check excluded services, insurance, taxes, utilities, and common area treatment.
GL extension rules support deeper review when detailed ledgers are available.
Advisory rules flag issues that may need expert review without inflating recovery totals.
Workflow
01
Extracted lease and statement fields determine which rule branches can run.
02
The engine applies the detection logic and produces findings, skips, or advisory notes.
03
Partners see amounts, confidence, supporting references, and rule context before delivery.
Related feature pages
Dollar amounts are calculated by deterministic rules, not guessed by AI.
Confidence scoring helps partners separate clear math findings from issues that need judgment.
Partners publish client-facing audit packages that carry their own brand and explain the recovery case.
Related guides and tools
FAQ
The engine evaluates the full rule set and runs the branches supported by the documents. If a file lacks required data for a branch, the result is skipped or advisory rather than invented.
Advisory findings can be useful, but they should not inflate a recovery number. They flag review questions without counting as confirmed overcharge dollars.
Next step
